<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nippon 2007 Hugo Nominees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.feministsf.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.feministsf.net/?p=138</link>
	<description>Feminists blog about science fiction, speculative fiction, and fantasy. Books, movies, comics, games, reason, &#38; ranting.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 01:30:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yonmei</title>
		<link>http://blogs.feministsf.net/?p=138&#038;cpage=1#comment-30547</link>
		<dc:creator>Yonmei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 10:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.feministsf.net/?p=138#comment-30547</guid>
		<description>And one woman nominated as &quot;Best Fan Artist&quot;,  and &lt;I&gt;no&lt;/I&gt; woman nominated as &quot;Best Fan Writer&quot;. 

I don&#039;t think I ever have filled in or voted for a Hugo Award - I&#039;ve only ever been to three Worldcons in my entire life, and if I&#039;ve read (or have an opinion on) even one nominee in each category, that&#039;s unusual. Since I decline to vote for someone just because I&#039;ve heard of them, I don&#039;t.

I certainly never have been to a Hugo Award &lt;I&gt;ceremony&lt;/I&gt;, not least because when I go to a convention, I&#039;m not ever packing dress-up clothes - I&#039;m definitely a jeans-and-tshirt kind of fan. I go to conventions to hang out with friends, have fun, go to panels (the specialised kind of &quot;fun&quot; that conventions provide) - I don&#039;t go to sit in the audience and watch other people getting awards.

All in all, really, I&#039;ve tended to regard the Hugo Awards as a big lump of &lt;I&gt;nothing to do with me&lt;/I&gt;.  They&#039;re not an effective indicator of quality or a measure of whether or not I&#039;ll like a book.  They&#039;re just that area of fandom&#039;s way of patting itself on the back. Sometimes, from an outsider&#039;s POV, those back-pats are merited (Sue Mason definitely deserves a Hugo by that standard, as well as deserving one for the quality/quantity of fan-related art she&#039;s done for zines and cons for years now) and sometimes, again from an outsider&#039;s POV, there seems to be no particular why-or-wherefore. 

Years ago two friends of mine edited an anthology of &quot;best UK fan writing&quot;. It was published at the 1995 Worldcon. They ran into me not long after and asked me when I&#039;d be buying a copy. &quot;Never,&quot; I said, &quot;I&#039;m not in it.&quot;

I didn&#039;t just mean that they hadn&#039;t used anything I&#039;d written: I meant that their &quot;best UK fan writing&quot; excluded as a group not worthy of consideration all the best fan writers &lt;B&gt;I&lt;/B&gt; knew in the UK - the fan writers who were writing and writing about fanfiction, especially slash. 

&quot;We were covering all of UK fandom!&quot; they said.

&quot;You weren&#039;t covering my area of it,&quot; I said. &quot;Just yours.&quot;

&quot;All of it!&quot;

&quot;Then where was Sebastian?&quot; I asked. &quot;Where was Eva Stuart?&quot; I went on to list quite a number of fan writers whom I knew they wouldn&#039;t even have considered -  and most probably, indeed, hadn&#039;t even heard of or read, but wouldn&#039;t have considered if they &lt;I&gt;had&lt;/I&gt;: just as they hadn&#039;t considered &lt;I&gt;my&lt;/I&gt; writing fit for inclusion.

&quot;Well, we weren&#039;t covering &lt;I&gt;media&lt;/I&gt; fandom.&quot;

&quot;Then you shouldn&#039;t claim you were covering UK fandom,&quot; I said.

Obviously this is an idealized and tidied up memory of a conversation I had nearly 12 years ago, but I&#039;ve had similiar conversations on the same line with other fans in that area of fandom: fans who Glottologgishly cannot &lt;I&gt;see&lt;/I&gt; that, outside their walls of air and darkness, there are whole other realms of fandom carrying on with their fannishness and paying no attention to what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And one woman nominated as &#8220;Best Fan Artist&#8221;,  and <i>no</i> woman nominated as &#8220;Best Fan Writer&#8221;. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I ever have filled in or voted for a Hugo Award &#8211; I&#8217;ve only ever been to three Worldcons in my entire life, and if I&#8217;ve read (or have an opinion on) even one nominee in each category, that&#8217;s unusual. Since I decline to vote for someone just because I&#8217;ve heard of them, I don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I certainly never have been to a Hugo Award <i>ceremony</i>, not least because when I go to a convention, I&#8217;m not ever packing dress-up clothes &#8211; I&#8217;m definitely a jeans-and-tshirt kind of fan. I go to conventions to hang out with friends, have fun, go to panels (the specialised kind of &#8220;fun&#8221; that conventions provide) &#8211; I don&#8217;t go to sit in the audience and watch other people getting awards.</p>
<p>All in all, really, I&#8217;ve tended to regard the Hugo Awards as a big lump of <i>nothing to do with me</i>.  They&#8217;re not an effective indicator of quality or a measure of whether or not I&#8217;ll like a book.  They&#8217;re just that area of fandom&#8217;s way of patting itself on the back. Sometimes, from an outsider&#8217;s POV, those back-pats are merited (Sue Mason definitely deserves a Hugo by that standard, as well as deserving one for the quality/quantity of fan-related art she&#8217;s done for zines and cons for years now) and sometimes, again from an outsider&#8217;s POV, there seems to be no particular why-or-wherefore. </p>
<p>Years ago two friends of mine edited an anthology of &#8220;best UK fan writing&#8221;. It was published at the 1995 Worldcon. They ran into me not long after and asked me when I&#8217;d be buying a copy. &#8220;Never,&#8221; I said, &#8220;I&#8217;m not in it.&#8221;</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t just mean that they hadn&#8217;t used anything I&#8217;d written: I meant that their &#8220;best UK fan writing&#8221; excluded as a group not worthy of consideration all the best fan writers <b>I</b> knew in the UK &#8211; the fan writers who were writing and writing about fanfiction, especially slash. </p>
<p>&#8220;We were covering all of UK fandom!&#8221; they said.</p>
<p>&#8220;You weren&#8217;t covering my area of it,&#8221; I said. &#8220;Just yours.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;All of it!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Then where was Sebastian?&#8221; I asked. &#8220;Where was Eva Stuart?&#8221; I went on to list quite a number of fan writers whom I knew they wouldn&#8217;t even have considered &#8211;  and most probably, indeed, hadn&#8217;t even heard of or read, but wouldn&#8217;t have considered if they <i>had</i>: just as they hadn&#8217;t considered <i>my</i> writing fit for inclusion.</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, we weren&#8217;t covering <i>media</i> fandom.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Then you shouldn&#8217;t claim you were covering UK fandom,&#8221; I said.</p>
<p>Obviously this is an idealized and tidied up memory of a conversation I had nearly 12 years ago, but I&#8217;ve had similiar conversations on the same line with other fans in that area of fandom: fans who Glottologgishly cannot <i>see</i> that, outside their walls of air and darkness, there are whole other realms of fandom carrying on with their fannishness and paying no attention to what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;The essence of sexism is that &#8216;male&#8217; is the unremarkable &#8216;default state.&#8217;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.feministsf.net/?p=138&#038;cpage=1#comment-29082</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;The essence of sexism is that &#8216;male&#8217; is the unremarkable &#8216;default state.&#8217;&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 04:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.feministsf.net/?p=138#comment-29082</guid>
		<description>[...] Ide Cyan notes: And there are no Japanese nominees either, although Worldcon, where the Hugos are awarded, is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ide Cyan notes: And there are no Japanese nominees either, although Worldcon, where the Hugos are awarded, is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.411 seconds -->
